eobet
18-11-2006, 12:13
Well it is a game for development and strategy...comparing to the previous Anno, micrmanagement has been reduced quiet a lot...but there has to be some challenge for the player, to keep ALL his activities in mind, not only some (like the Queen) :go:
As someone who hasn't really played Anno before, how has the micro management been reduced in 1701?
Imo, there is no such thing as "too much" micro management, as I think it makes you more involved in the game. :)
I guess, this is in fact a mayor problem between American and European gaming.
Oh my god, that is so true! Railroad Tycoon II was a wonderfully complex and detailed game, but the new Railroads, which is a proper sequel, but Sid said in an interview that the "tycoon" brand had become dilluted to he dropped it, but dear lord, I played the demo and the bloody game plays itself! No fun at all, except if you're three years old. I mean, I thought that OpenTTD was a sandbox game, but Railroads is miles beyond that... it's gaming eqvivalent of stacking colored blocks as an infant. There literally is no game in there.
As someone who hasn't really played Anno before, how has the micro management been reduced in 1701?
Imo, there is no such thing as "too much" micro management, as I think it makes you more involved in the game. :)
I guess, this is in fact a mayor problem between American and European gaming.
Oh my god, that is so true! Railroad Tycoon II was a wonderfully complex and detailed game, but the new Railroads, which is a proper sequel, but Sid said in an interview that the "tycoon" brand had become dilluted to he dropped it, but dear lord, I played the demo and the bloody game plays itself! No fun at all, except if you're three years old. I mean, I thought that OpenTTD was a sandbox game, but Railroads is miles beyond that... it's gaming eqvivalent of stacking colored blocks as an infant. There literally is no game in there.