PDA

View Full Version : [en] Evolution or Creationism


Pages : 1 2 3 4 [5]

Angryminer
18-04-2007, 00:02
I think you are using 'active' and 'passive' differently than we do.
When I speak about an active process I mean something you actively do. You can actively go to the fridge and get a cold beer, because you desired to do so. But you can't actively start growing wings, just the same as brown bears can't actively start growing white fur to become polar bears.
Similarly you can die of the bite of a very mean tiger, which is passive because you propably didn't actively try to cause that event. Similarly the black dogs in my kennel-example didn't actively cause themselves to be shot and neither did any other animal that died try to become extinct.

In that sense evolution is a passive process, because never a prehistoric lizard tried to concentrate very hard to grow feathers and wings to become a bird. More accuratly the change from lizards to birds is a sum of 'random' mutations, which went in a certain direction, what we call bird today, because all other mutations died since they were less capable of successfully reproducing than the more bird-like creatures.

* I think none of us are trying to convince anybody. We're exchanging and explaining our views to improve the scope of our knowledge. Perhaps you have a point as an answer I didn't yet consider, so I can get a more objective view on the matter.

Angryminer

Richard
18-04-2007, 21:28
In that context then yes, it is passive, the "lizards" didn't think, "hmm if I have wings and feathers I can live much better" and boom they grew feathers...
Where these mutuations random? I don't think so, they were needed for the animal to survive. They were forced by nature and the enviromental changes. The mechanism of natural selection is always present and in those extreme changes it can be said that it "decides" which traits are better fit for the new enviroment and which are useless changing the genetic frequency of these traits.
So it is not the animal deciding, "ohh I want wings, don't like walking anymore", but the changes in the enviroment(which are almost constant) which triggers natural selection, which then pin points the changes of the animal to better fit the place it inhabits.

Angryminer
18-04-2007, 21:42
The genetical mutation is something that happens somewhere between 'mother lizard and daddy lizard meet' and 'baby lizard is born'. That is a very random process which is based on irregularities during the splicing of two DNAs.
The principle of evolution, the statistical combination of random genetic mutation and natural selection over a prolonged period of time, which leads to birds, isn't random, but a result of the enviroment and it's changes.

So we basically agree? Bah, nothing is more boring than agreeing. :silly:

Angryminer

Richard
19-04-2007, 22:47
Yep, it really is boring:sad:

Lets have a drink in the tavern to refresh our mouths. :cheers: