PDA

View Full Version : most nations covered


Pages : 1 [2] 3 4

Elewyn
09-06-2004, 09:52
some things about history of your region. I will tell you only relevant periods, so let's say since Frankish empire of Charlemagne (Carolus magnus).

In 800, when he became emperor, Whole Low countries were part of his empire. His ancestors had some regular problems with Frieses, but they already were defeated.
843 Verdun treaty, division of Frankish empire to 3 parts: West (core od France, includes Flandre), central- Lotharingia (description by nowadays provinces and cities:Friesland, Utrecht, Nijmegen, Antwerpen, Cambrai, Köln, Verdun, Trier, Metz, Toul - province Lorraine, Besancon, Basel, Geneve, Lyon, Arles +northern Italy) and Eastern which corresponded with West Germany until 1989+western parts of Austria and east of Switzerland

Central part splited into 3 parts: Lotharingia(north of Basel), Burgundy (west of Alps) and Italy. Thos one by one became parts of Eastern empire, forst Lotharingia, then Italy, then Burgundy.

Rulers of Eastern frankish empire became Roman emperors in 962 with OttoI.

Low countries as well as the rest of this Roman Empire (since 1158 Holy Empire, since 1254 Holy Roman Empire) splited into smalled duchies and counties, but under souvereignrule of the Emperor. Low counrties splited into: Hainaut(Hennegau), Brabant, Luxembourg, Limburg, Liege, Zeeland, Holland, Gelre, Utrecht and Friesland and Flandre, vassal of France. There were local count dynasties, but they were not independent, they were subjected to imperial laws and were officialy represented by the Emperor. Almost all those provinces became in late 14th and 15th century part Duchy of Burgundy (including Flandre).

In 1477 Charles, Duke of Burgundy died without an heir, and his dominions were divided between Spanish Habsburgs (whole Low countries, Franche-Comté) and France (Artois, Burgundy itself).

After reformation in 16th century northern part of so called Spanish Netherlands became mainly calvinistic and in 1582 declared independance as United provinces of Netherlands. It was Holland, Gelre, Utrecht Friesland and some smaller ones. Southern part stayed under Spanish rule (mostly nowadays Belgium and Luxembourg.
In 1648 Habsburgs accepted officially independence of United provinces. etc.

So... Until 1582 the Netherlands was under foreign rule, however local dynasties were half- independent as vassals of HRE and France. in 13th and 14th century Flandre and Brabant were politicaly very strong, so in system of KoH they would deserve being vassal states of France (as Flandre because no Brabant is in KoH) the rest can be given half-independence in entry point in 1350, so Friesland may be vassal of the HRE in late period, Flandre probably part of Burgundy (historicaly since 1364).

What I suggest about Netherlands and Belgium in KoH?
early middle ages
900: both provinces as part of Lotharingia
1000: Flandre-part of France, Friesland-part of HRE

high middle ages
1200. Flandre-playable vassal state of France (Belgium is happy :cheers: ), Friesland-part of HRE

late middle ages
1350: Flandre-part of Burgundy, Friesland-playable vassal state of HRE/Germany (the Dutch are happy :cheers: )

absolutely refuse calling any state by actual names! No Netherlands, no Belgium, no Czech Republic, no Belarus, No Slovakia, no Greece, no Germany, no Spain, no Latvia, no Yugoslavia, no Albania, no Slovenia, no Romania etc.

Ben Nevis
09-06-2004, 10:24
985 -Otto III, keizer van het Roomse Rijk, schenkt Dirk II Kennemerland, het Maasland en Texel, gebieden die Dirk reeds in leen had
985 Otto III, emperor of the Roman empire, donates Kennermerland, het Maasland and Texel (parts of Holland) to Dirk II, parts he already lended.
1100 De naam HOLLAND wordt voor het eerst rond deze tijd gebruikt om het gebied van Dirk V aan te duiden.
1100 The name Holland is used for the first time to describe Dirk V's land.
QUOTE]1190 - Hendrik I van Brabant voegt Breda, Geertruidenberg en Herewaarden later toe aan Brabant. Maastricht wordt door Otto IV, kandidaat koning/keizer van Duitsland, overgedragen aan Brabant. Hendrik I neemt Dirk VII van Holland gevangen tijdens een strijd te Dordrecht. Hij overwint Otto I van Gelre, neemt hem gevangen en verwerft Oosterbeek[/QUOTE]
1190 - Hendrik I of Brabant adds Breda, Geertruidenberg en Herewaarden to Brabant. Maastricht is handed over to Brabant by Otto IV, candidate to become the king/emperor of the Holy Roman Empire. Hendrik I emprisons Dirk VII of Holland during a battle over Dordrecht. He wins from Otto I of Gelre, captures him en annexes Oosterbeek.

Of course there have been loads of ties with the Holy Roman Empire during the middle ages , and I dare say we have been part of it (although it doesn't show on your own maps ;) ), but there was probably more sovereignity (and maybe if that's a too big a word, autonomy) than you think, shown by the quotes. Why would Otto I of Gelre and Hendrik I of Holland fight against each other when they belonged to the same "Holy Roman Empire".
The main problem is that we don't know much for sure concerning the dark ages.

Ben Nevis
09-06-2004, 10:29
btw, I'm already more than satisfied with Friesland as a playable nation :bday:

I was merely replying to the American (and he probably doesn't know anything about European history, thus a little bluf wouldn't hurt)
:cheers:

Elewyn
09-06-2004, 10:54
it was my suggestion as senior member, not as a developer (that thing with Flandres and Friesland as vassal, but playable states. I hope devs accept it as good solution. Making happy 15 and 10 millions of potential buyers withuot losing historical accurancy...

Almost all imperial dukes and counts had wars among themselves. That feudal lords had "personal" wars doesn't indicate independance. It's like sayin that dominions of bohemian noble family of Rosenbergs was independent state because they fought with oher local nobles. It was quite obvious.
The diference is that it was the Emperor (or imperial judges) who judged issues among low-countries' lords as well as between f.e. austrian Babenbergers and bavarian Wittelsbachs. They were subjects of the Empire. thet bohemian example is quite diferent. Bohemians had right to recall imperial courts only in issues of their possesions outside Bohemia and Moravia.

French dukes also made wars among themselves, but their final instance of court was french royal parliament in Paris.

Personal wars are not indication of independence. It is political power, foreign policy and law. by law Low countries were absolutely under HRE, like all duchies in nowadays Germany and Austria. They also were all represented by the empror (until approx. 1250)

- being official vassal, but with own foreign policy and laws is one mean of subjectivity (Bohemia, in 11th century also Poland)
- being vassal and being able to lead own foreign policy to close neighbours, but generaly being representated by emperor and being under imperial laws is another kind of subjectivity (Austria, Bavaria, Holland, Flandre-to France)
- being vassal subjected by law, representation and also possibility to lead own foreign policy as devise of an overlord is the last one (normal knights and lower nobility)

Ben Nevis
09-06-2004, 11:16
I surrender ;)
:cheers:

Ben Nevis
09-06-2004, 11:17
I'll sign the treaty with the Holy Roman Empire aka
Germany (puke)
:bday:

Finellach
09-06-2004, 15:52
This thread made me think that it would be better to have a game that covers the period between 15/16th to the 18/19th century. IMO that would be far more interesting than having medival China, Japan and so on....

Elewyn
09-06-2004, 16:43
so play Europa Universalis :)

Finellach
09-06-2004, 17:00
I don't like EU2 that much....I like strategies, but RTS not TBS....

Angryminer
09-06-2004, 20:48
EU2 is RTS. But well, you can't fight battles out by yourself.

Angryminer

Finellach
09-06-2004, 20:57
I would classify EU2 as TBS rather than RTS. Real RTS is AoE or AoM.

Angryminer
09-06-2004, 21:04
RTS: Real Time Strategy

There is no 'finish round'-button in EU2, so it isn't turnbased but real time.
But I know what you mean, so back to topic ;) .

Angryminer

Frujin
09-06-2004, 21:33
@Ben Nevis: There IS playable independant Gelre in High Period.

Ben Nevis
09-06-2004, 22:22
Thanks Frujin, you just made my day :bday:
:cheers:
(special thanks go out to Elewyn, to keep this threat vivid and alive ;))

Finellach
10-06-2004, 01:57
Originally posted by Ben Nevis
...to keep this threat vivid and alive ;))

You mean thread not threat? ;)

Btw. this Gelre....is this a province or a name for a duchy? I think I saw this in Crusader Kings and it was a mere county. :confused:

I mut say that I don't know much about that area of Europe. All other parts are not so enigmatic and I know a bit about all of them except about low countries. If someone would point me to some website or something like that I would appreciate that very much. ;)

Ben Nevis
10-06-2004, 09:05
it's "I muSt say"
and "THE low countries"
The name of Gelre is based on the historic region. Gelre was a duchy in the late middle ages, later one of the 12 Dutch provinces. The Dutch cities of Arnhem, Nijmegen and the now German cities Kleve, Goch, Geldern were part of this duchy.

During the middle-ages the Netherlands were shaped by a

Frank Fay
10-06-2004, 09:07
Ben: You can play Gelre in KoH....

Ben Nevis
10-06-2004, 09:07
During the middle-ages the Netherlands were shaped by a group of autonomous duchies, Gelre, Brabant and counties, Holland, Zeeland and the diocese of Utrecht. Under the Habsburg monarch, Charles 5th (1500-1558), these territories and the nowadays called Belgium and Luxemburg were united to one territory under the name "Lage Landen", Nether Lands and they were added to the big Bourgondian-Habsburg Empire

Ben Nevis
10-06-2004, 09:08
Frank, I'm really thankful for that

:cheers:

Frank Fay
10-06-2004, 09:13
sorry, havent seen that Frujin responded already :cheers: